Even as the economy and financial markets emit clear signals of healing, concerns linger, especially about
commercial mortgages. Rising defaults and a lack of easy liquidity have led many observers to wonder if problems in
the United States might create something akin to the recent subprime debacle, a “second shoe,” as some people call
it. But while there is reason to expect increased defaults in this area and still greater losses going forward, it would,
nonetheless, be a mistake to characterize problems in such a way. On the contrary, matters promise to remain
contained, and for all the likelihood of future defaults, the yield spreads on these loans, particularly commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), more than compensate for any likely losses.
The fears surrounding this debt have kept CMBS yields high relative to Treasuries, even as other credit spreads have
narrowed. Of course, all credit spreads widened late last year and early this year as the credit crisis deepened. Junk
bond yields jumped, from 700 basis points (bps) to 2,100 bps over Treasuries, while high-grade corporate yields
widened, from 300 bps to almost 850 bps. The yield on ‘AAA’ rated CMBS paper rose, from 30 bps over Treasuries to
1,300 bps, and spreads on ‘A’ rated CMBS paper jumped, from 900 bps to over 4,000 bps. But this spring, as other
bond spreads began to shrink, those on CMBS paper did not. Junk bonds fell back by April, to 1,100 bps, and
presently stand at 750–800 bps. High-grade corporate bond spreads have come in to 250 bps. But CMBS yields have
either held their premium over Treasury yields or extended it farther. The only exception is the ‘AAA’ rated CMBS
paper, which has seen its yield spreads decline, from 1,200 bps to 600–700 bps.
Some of this continued pressure on CMBS spreads not only reflects the continued, disappointing default experience
but also fears about the future. Overall defaults in all commercial mortgages, including those behind CMBS, rose from
only 0.1% of such loans outstanding in early 2007 to 1.0% in 2008, to 2.1% by mid-2009 (the most recent period for
which data are available). Delinquency rates have expanded, from 1.5% of loans outstanding in 2007 to 4.5% in 2008,
to almost 8.0% in mid-2009. For CMBS paper in particular, defaults have stayed lower than with commercial mortgage
credit generally, but they have increased nonetheless, jumping from 0.58% of all CMBS paper outstanding in June
2008 to 0.82% in September 2009 (the most recent period for which data are available).
But even as these defaults and delinquencies have risen, they cannot justify today’s still tremendous yield spreads.
Indeed, even if the market’s worst fears on defaults were to come true, such spreads would more than compensate. If,
say, defaults were to rise over the next 12 months by the same factor as they have over the last 12 months, to 21%,
the lowest quality of these bonds could absorb that loss and still yield, on average, nine or more percentage points
over Treasuries. Since that value looks good even in this worst-case scenario, CMBS bonds look especially attractive,
knowing that such an extreme eventuality is not especially likely. After all, even after the economic and financial
calamity of the past 12 months, overall default rates remain below their records of the early 1990s; and, with the
economy recovering, any further deterioration will more likely be muted than exaggerated. Indeed, in the past six
months, default rates on commercial mortgages overall have actually come down a touch, from 2.3% at the end of
2008 to the 2.1% figure presently.
Still further, actions by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to relieve some of the liquidity strain argue against the
extreme outcomes for which these securities are priced. In July 2008, for example, the Fed made some higher-quality
CMBS paper eligible as collateral for loans under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), giving this
area a source of liquidity that previously was closed to it. In all probability, this TALF action alone explains why ‘AAA’
rated CMBS yield spreads shrank during the past few months, even as lower-quality spreads were held at high levels
or expanded farther. Also bringing a form of relief to these markets was when the Treasury just last month allowed
servicers and borrowers to restructure loans without tax consequences. Since previously borrowers had to just about declare bankruptcy to restructure without tax consequences, this change will also bring liquidity to this market by
giving both borrowers and lenders ways to relieve trouble without either having to go to extremes or pay a tax penalty.
With these actions in place and the economy improving, there is little reason at all to expect the extreme default and
delinquency rates widely feared these days. And since the spreads on these bonds already more than compensate for
such extremes, the limited likelihood that they will even occur makes such bonds that much more attractive.
Note: The value of an investment in bonds will change as interest rates fluctuate in response to market movements. When interest rates rise, the
prices of debt securities are likely to decline, and when interest rates fall, the prices of debt securities tend to rise. High-yielding, non-investment
grade bonds involve higher risk than investment-grade bonds. Adverse conditions may affect the issuer’s ability to pay interest and principal on
these securities. In addition, bonds may be subject to other types of risk such as credit, call and general market risk.
Milton Ezrati, Partner and Senior Economist and Market Strategist, has been widely published in a wide variety of
magazines, scholarly journals, and newspapers, including The New York Times, Financial Times, The Wall Street
Journal, The Christian Science Monitor, and Foreign Affairs, on a broad spectrum of investment management topics.
Prior to joining Lord Abbett, Mr. Ezrati was Senior Vice President and head of investing in the Americas for Nomura
Asset Management, where he helped direct investment strategies for both equity and fixed-income investment
management.
The opinions in the preceding economic commentary are as of the date of publication, are subject to change based on subsequent
developments, and may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast,
research, or investment advice regarding a particular investment or the markets in general. Nor is it intended to predict or depict
performance of any investment. This document is prepared based on information Lord Abbett deems reliable; however, Lord
Abbett does not warrant the accuracy and completeness of the information. Consult a financial advisor on the strategy best for
you.
All Lord Abbett mutual funds are offered by prospectus only and are available through your financial advisor.
Shares of Lord Abbett mutual funds are not FDIC insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or
any other entity. Investments in mutual funds involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the
principal amount invested. Before investing in any of the Lord Abbett mutual funds, investors should
carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. To obtain a prospectus on
any Lord Abbett mutual fund, please contact your investment professional or Lord Abbett Distributor LLC at
(888) 522-2388 or visit our Website at www.lordabbett.com.
Copyright © 2009 by Lord Abbett Distributor LLC. All rights reserved.
Website: www.lordabbett.com
NOT FDIC INSURED—NO BANK GUARANTEES—MAY LOSE VALUE