Convertible bonds have different return patterns depending on how the underlying common stock has performed since the issuance. If a convertible bond's corresponding stock price is below the conversion price, it is valued like a straight bond with an out-of-the-money call option attached. As the stock price reaches or surpasses the bond's conversion price, this instrument will begin to trade in line with the stock, allowing the investors to participate in the stock’s upswing.
Convertible bonds can be appealing because they offer much of the upside potential of stocks while limiting downside risk, as they offer regular bondlike cash flows before conversion.
Why Do Companies Issue Convertible Bonds?
Most convertible bond issuers are rated below-investment-grade. Raising capital through straight bonds may prove too costly for these firms, as they would have to offer high interest rates to entice investors to accept their credit risk. Alternatively, these firms could issue equity, which would lessen the burden on the issuer’s cash flow. However, doing so would dilute the ownership of current shareholders, and the market often reacts negatively to new share issuances. The primary reason for this is the adverse selection phenomenon. Equity investors conclude that, on average, only firms with a negative outlook would be willing to issue new shares and court new shareholders. While markets may react negatively to issuance of convertible bonds, the magnitude of the reaction tends to be smaller than an equity offering.
From the issuer’s perspective, it could secure equity capital at a relatively low issuance cost and avoid possible underpricing associated with seasoned equity offerings. Moreover, the firm benefits from knowing that the bonds will be converted into shares of common stock when the stock price is relatively high and may allow the firm to avoid repaying the bond’s principal.
Current State of the Convertibles Market
Traditionally, technology and healthcare firms have been the largest issuers of convertible debt. These companies often have limited assets to pledge as collateral and volatile cash flows, which may deter lenders from providing capital. But they have been able to attract investors looking to participate in stock price appreciation. Currently the convertibles market is dominated by technology companies. This is driven by growth-oriented companies such as Intel
, Lam Research
, and Microchip Technology
that have issued large amounts of convertible debt in the past few years. The surge in tech sector stock prices enabled these companies to tap the convertibles market at attractive terms. Convertible debt may also be more accessible than traditional debt financing for many high-tech firms because they often have volatile cash flows and limited fixed assets to pledge as collateral.
Convertibles funds can be a worthwhile choice for investors seeking the income of a bond while maintaining exposure to some upside potential of the underlying stock. There are many ways to get exposure to these securities.
The convertible bond market does not have as many active investors as the traditional investment-grade bond market because of the instrument’s complexity and smaller size of this market. It is difficult to accurately value a convertible bond. The call option on the underlying stock largely dictates the bond’s intrinsic value. However, like any long-run price forecast, the result is noisy. Furthermore, the volatility of the embedded call option is not directly observable, making it even harder to value the option using a traditional option pricing models. Also, because of the security’s hybrid nature, many traditional money managers do not have a natural place in their portfolios or their mandates. Consequently, these bonds are less liquid and costlier to trade.
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF
(expense ratio 0.40%), which has a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Neutral, provides market-cap-weighted exposure to U.S. convertible bonds across the credit-rating spectrum. While this market-cap-weighting approach reduces transaction costs, it leads to a concentrated tech sector bet. However, the fund lagged its benchmark by 72 basis points during the trailing 12 months through August 2017 as a result of its fee and high transaction costs. IShares Convertible Bond ETF (expense ratio 0.20%) charges half of CWB’s fee, but during the past year the fund lagged its benchmark by 83 basis points. This wider gap is attributable to the fact that the fund’s index, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond >$250MM Index, encompasses smaller and less liquid issues, which can be more expensive to trade.
Actively managed funds are better equipped to deal with the liquidity challenges of this market. Out of the actively managed options, AllianzGI Convertible
is the highest rated with an Analyst Rating of Silver. It charges a reasonable 0.67% expense ratio. It employs a team with two decades of experience that balances income and capital appreciation while avoiding deep out-of-the-money convertible bonds.
In the closed-end fund arena, Calamos Convertible Opportunities & Income has been one of the better-performing funds. The team at Calamos has traditionally focused on higher-credit-quality convertible securities that managers believe are trading at moderate conversion premiums, meaning the convertible security's price movements are somewhat correlated with its underlying equity's price movements. This fund, like many closed-end funds, uses leverage, which can boost returns but also increases risk.
Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc. licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.